Stop spraying the room. Start spraying the die.
| Produkte, Technologie
Hand Spray vs. Robot Spray in Forging
In many forging shops, lubricant is still applied manually with hand spray guns.
While this method has been used for decades, it often creates overspray, graphite mist, contamination of equipment, and unnecessary die wear.
These effects are usually accepted as unavoidable side effects of forging — but in reality they are caused by how lubrication is applied, not by the forging process itself.
Modern robotic spray systems make it possible to apply lubricant precisely, repeatably, and only where it is needed.
This reduces consumption, protects dies, stabilizes the process, and improves working conditions at the same time.
Click the tabs below to explore the problems, the number and the solution.
The Problem
The difference between manual and robotic spray application is not theoretical.
It directly affects lubricant consumption, die wear, cleanliness, maintenance effort, and process stability.
The comparison shows why many of the “normal” issues in forging are not caused by the forging process itself — but by how lubrication is applied.
The Numbers
A quantitative evaluation of manual vs. robotic graphite lubrication was published in FIA Magazine, Feb 2026.
Key results:
_Up to 70% less lubricant
_20–40% longer die life
_Reduced contamination
_Improved process stability
Vision & Solution
At AED, we believe lubrication is not a side process in forging.
It is a key factor for die protection, part quality, and process reliability.
Our mission is to empower forgers with intelligent automation that preserves these core principles.
AED develops tailored robot spray systems specifically for forging environments, designed for precise, repeatable, micro-controlled lubricant application.